{"id":2735,"date":"2022-04-22T10:00:32","date_gmt":"2022-04-22T10:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/?p=2735"},"modified":"2022-04-06T15:09:40","modified_gmt":"2022-04-06T15:09:40","slug":"no-441-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/?p=2735","title":{"rendered":"No. 441"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><u>Cricket<\/u><\/p>\n<p>Our prospects for the Cricket season of 1880 were not bright, as it was understood that only F.C. Ryde (T.B.), the eleventh man of last season, would be here, and that upon him would devolve the arduous task of giving away ten \u2018pinks\u2019. Benbow however came back, but did not retain the captaincy, and Sandwith also played for us. Our first match was against \u2018Old Haileyburians\u2019 when we fell utterly to pieces, but improved considerably before meeting M.C.C. and Gr: and were able to make a good match of it. The results of the succeeding matches will show that the Eleven eventually came up to the usual average.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. Old Haileyburians<\/u> April 17<sup>th<\/sup> lost by 84 runs<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">O.H. 122 \u2013 Westminster School 38 (Higgins 12)<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">For us Sandwith took four wickets in five balls<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. M.C.C. and Ground<\/u> June 5<sup>th<\/sup> lost by 9 runs<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">M.C.C. 118 and 178. Westminster School 109.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">For us Sandwith made, not out, 30, Benbow 21. Ryde 16. Reece 12. Higgins 11.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. Incogniti<\/u> June 9<sup>th<\/sup> lost by 128 runs<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Incogniti 250<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Westminster 122 and 38 for eight wickets<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. Old Westminsters <\/u>June 12<sup>th<\/sup> won by 264 runs<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">O.WW. 70<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Westminster 185 \u2013 Wetton 47. Higgins 45. Benbow 21. Dale 16. Robson 13. Bain 10<sup>+<\/sup> not out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Higgins took 8 crickets for 32 runs, and 4 wickets for 25 runs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. Nondescripts<\/u> July 3<sup>rd<\/sup> lost by 129 runs<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Nondescripts 179<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Westminster 50 and 29 for 3 wickets<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">For us Higgins made 25 and, not out, 9 \u2013 (and took 6 wickets for 82 runs) Benbow 5 and 19<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. I Zingari<\/u> This match was put off as I.Z. could not get up an Eleven for the day fixed, July 7<sup>th<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. Lords and Commons.<\/u> July 17<sup>th<\/sup> won by 71 runs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Houses 65 and 92 for 7 wickets<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Westminster 136.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Sandwith 31, Higgins 26, Ryde 16<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. E.M. Wilde\u2019s Eleven<\/u> July 14<sup>th<\/sup> won by 133 runs<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Wilde\u2019s XI 40.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Westminster 173. Higgins 34. Sandwith 29. Benbow 22. Bain, not out, 20. Ryde 19.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><u>v. Charterhouse<\/u> played at Godalming. July 24<sup>th<\/sup>. Lost by 78 runs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">\u00a0 Charterhouse 147<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">Westminster 69 and 88 for 9 wickets [For fuller account see 442]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><u>H.C. Benbow Prin: Opp:<\/u><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cricket Our prospects for the Cricket season of 1880 were not bright, as it was understood that only F.C. Ryde (T.B.), the eleventh man of last season, would be here, and that upon him would devolve the arduous task of giving away ten \u2018pinks\u2019. Benbow however came back, but did not retain the captaincy, and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[727,730,522],"tags":[30],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2735"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2735"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2735\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2738,"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2735\/revisions\/2738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/townboyledger.westminster.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}